The following questions are regarding the Temporary Construction Dewatering triple bottom line analysis results.
Based on the results of the triple bottom line analysis that shows the Environmental and Urban Scenarios resulted in most benefit, do you support moving these two scenarios forward to policy analysis?
Based on the low scores of the triple bottom line analysis, do you support removing the Social and the Economic Scenarios from further policy evaluation?
Would you support a hybrid scenario that leverages the benefits of the Aesthetic Scenario of meeting population targets by keeping building heights at current levels?
Do you have additional comments?
Thank you for participating.
Please press submit.
